Bradt Family Society Page
THE NORWEGIAN BRADT FAMILY in New Netherland New York
© Lorine McGinnis Schulze
Albert Andriessen De Noorman aka Bradt and his First Wife, Annetie Barents (Van) Rottmers
Albert Andriessen, or Albert Andriessen Bradt [Bratt] was one of the earliest Norwegian settlers in New Netherland. He
came from Fredrikstad, a town at the mouth of the Glommen, the largest river in Norway. In the early records he is often called
Albert de Noorman (the Norwegian). After 1670 he became known as Albert Andriesz Bradt. Whether he was related to the Bratts
of Norwegian nobility, can not be ascertained. The Bratt family lived in Bergen, Norway, before the early part of the fifteenth
century, when it moved to the northern part of Gudbrandsdalen. It had a coat of arms until about the middle of the sixteenth
century. Since that time the Bratts belong to the Norwegian peasantry. They have a number of large farms in Gudbrandsdalen,
Hedemarken, Toten, and Land.' In the state of New York there are many families of the name of Bradt, descendants of the pioneer
The name of Albert Andriessen occurs for the first time in a document bearing the date August 26, 1636, an agreement between
him and two others on the one hand, and the patroon of the colony of Rensselaerswyck, Kiliaen van Rensselaer, on the other.
The agreement was made and signed in Amsterdam. It states that Andriessen was a tobacco planter. He may have learnt the cultivating
of tobacco in Holland, where tobacco was raised as early as 1616.
In the name of the Lord, Amen. On conditions hereafter specified, we, Pieter Cornelissen van munnickendam, millwright,
43 years of age, Claesz jans van naerden, 33 years of age, house carpenter, and albert andriessen van fredrickstadt, 29 years
of age, tobacco planter, have agreed among ourselves, first, to sail in God's name to New Netherland in the small vessel which
now lies ready and to betake ourselves to the colony of Rensselaerswyck for the purpose of settling there on the following
conditions made with Mr. Kiliaen Van Rensselaer, as patroon of the said colony, etc.
"Thus done and passed, in good faith, under pledge of our persons and property subject to all courts and justices
for the fulfillment of what is aforewritten, at Amsterdam, this 26th of August .
'In witness whereof we have signed these with our own hands in the presence of the undersigned notary public . .
"Kiliaen Van Rensselaer
"albert and riessen . . -. "Claes jansen.
"J. Vande Ven, Notary."
As Andriessen was twenty-nine years of age when he made the agreement with Kiliaen Van Rensselaer, he must have been born
about 1607. Pursuant to the stipulation in the agreement, he sailed, accompanied by his wife, Annetje Barents of "Rolmers,"
and as it would seem by two children, October 8, 1636, on the "Rensselaerswyck," which arrived at New Amsterdam
March 4, 1637.
On this voyage, which was very stormy, his wife gave birth to a son, who received the name of Storm and who in later records
is frequently called Storm from the Sea. The log of the ship ("Rinselaers Wijck") contains under the date of November
1 and 2 [1636J, the following interesting entries which are given in facsimile in the "Van Rensselaer Bowier Manuscripts,"
The translation is as follows:
Saturday 1. In the morning we veered toward the west and drifted north. The Wind S. W with rough weather and high
seas. The past half day and entire night.
Sunday: 2. Drifted 16 leagues N. E. by E.; the wind about west, the latitude by dead reckoning 41 degrees, 50 minutes
with very high seas. That day the overhang above our rudder was knocked in by severe storm. This day a child was born on the
ship, and named and baptized in England Stoerm; the mother is Asnetie Baernts. This day gone.
Inasmuch as there were eight children born to Andriessen and his wife, Storm being the third, two of their children, Barent
and Eva, were likely with their parents on this voyage. Five of their children were born in the new world: Engeltje, Gisseltje,
Andries, Jan and Dirck
Andriessen and his partners were to operate a mill. But not long after his arrival he took the liberty of dissolving partnership
and established himself as a tobacco planter. Van Renssselaer had sent greetings to him in a letter dated September 21, 1637,
(addressed to the partner of Andriessen, Pieter Cornelisz, master millwright) but in a subsequent letter, of May 8, 1638,
to Cornelisz he wrote: "Albert Andriessen separated from you, I hear that he is a strange character, and it is therefore
no wonder that he could not get along with you."6 Nevertheless, Van Rensselaer entertained the hope that Albert Andriessen
would succeed as a tobacco planter. On December 29, 1637, he wrote to Director William Kieft that he should assign some of
the young men on board the "Calmar Sleutel", commanded by Pieter Minuit and sailing in the same month, to tobacco
planting with Aiidriessen "if he has good success," otherwise they were to serve with the farmers.
These young men were inexperienced, it seems. One, Elbert Elbertz, from Nieukerck, eighteen years old, was a weaver; Claes
Jansen, from the same place, seventeen years old, was a tailor; Gerrit Hendricksz, also from the same place, fifteen year
old, was a shoemaker. Gerrit must have served Andriessen for a term of at least three years; for his first three years' wages,
from April 2, 1638 to April 2, 1641, are charged to Andriessen.
In a letter of May 10, 1638, Van Rensselaer advised Andriessen that he had duly received his letter stating that the tobacco
looked fine. But he was desirous to get full particulars as to how the crop had turned out, and to get a sample of the tobacco.
He expressed dissatisfaction at Andriessen having separated from Pieter Cornelisz, and liked to know the cause of his dispute
with the officer and commis Jacob Albertsz Planck and his son. He informed Andriessen that he was obliged to uphold his officers.
and promised him to stand by him and cause him to be "provided with everything." But he would not suffer bad behavior.
He also informed him that it was apparent from the news he had received from several people that he was "very unmerciful
to his children and very cruel" to his wife; he was to avoid this "and in all things have the fear of the Lord"
before his eyes and not follow so much his own inclinations. But there was also another matter for which Van Rensselaer censured
him: he had traded beaver furs with Dirck Corszen Stam contrary to contract, defrauded and cheated him. For seven pieces of
duffel he had given him only the value of twenty-five merchantable beavers.
Van Rensselaer also addressed a letter, of the same date, to Jacob Albertsz Planck informing him that he had written to
Andriessen that he should have more respect for the officers. Planck was instructed to notify Andriessen and all others living
in the colony not to engage in "such detrimental fur trade," for he did not care to suffer in his colony those who
had their eyes mainly on the fur trade.'
Notwithstanding, it was Dirck Corszen that was an unfaithful supercargo. And Van Rensselaer requested, in a letter of
May 13, 1639, of Andriessen, that he should write him the truth of the matter and pay him what he still owed Corszen. If he
saw that Andriessen acted honestly herein, he would do all in his power to help him. Andriessen should go to the superintendent
of the colony, Arent van Curler, and purchase necessaries for himself and his own people at an advance in price of 50 per
cent. He should get merchandise for the Indian trade at an advance of 75 per cent. In return he was to furnish Van Curler
with skins at such a price that he could make something on the transaction.
Van Rensselaer also informed Andriessen that he would try to sell his tobacco at the highest price and furthermore give
him 25 per cent more than his half of the net proceeds would amount to. He would moreover grant him 25 per cent discount on
the grain which he bought. In fact, Van Rensselaer's confidence in Andriessen seemed to be increasing. For he not only acknowledged
that he had received several letters from him, but also wished to say to his credit that he had received returns from no one.
but him. He complained, however, of the tobacco which had been sent to him in barrels. It was a great loss to both that the
"tobacco was so poor and thin of leaf that it could not stand being rolled." This. he thought, was likely due to
Andriessen having left too many leaves on the plants. But not this alone: the weight was short. One barrel, put down at 292
lbs., weighed but 220 lbs. This was perhaps due to deception on the part of a certain Herman, a furrier. But anything like
this should be avoided in the future. The tobacco amounted to 1,156 pounds net, which was sold for 8 st. (16 cents) a pound.
Had it not been so bad and wretched, it could have been sold for twenty cents a pound. A higher price could be obtained if
Andriessen would be more careful in the future and leave fewer leaves on the plants. He should try to grow "good stuff",
for the tobacco from St. Christopher, an island in the West Indies, was so plentiful in Netherland that it brought but 3 stivers
a pound. Andriessen should also each year make out a complete account of all expenses and receipts from tobacco, so Van Rensselaer
could see whether any progress was made.
But Andriessen was a poor accountant. Neither Van Rensselaer nor his nephew, the former Director Van Twiller, could understand
his accounts.1' Van Rensselaer therefore gave him directions to follow in making his entries and statements, claimingthat
any other procedure would "leave everything confused and mixed up." He complained that Andriessen laid certain transactions
before the patroon, which should be laid before the cornmis. He expressed the sentiment that Andriessen was making him his
servant when he wrote to him "about soap and other things." He also complained that Andriessen caused great loss
by making him hold the tobacco too high: it was safest to follow the market price in Netherland. Finally he censured him for
buying unwisely - he had paid f. 200 for a heifer, "which is much too high." is The patroon and Andriessen had several
The latter, with his brother Arent Andriessen, sent to the patroon sometime in 1642, 4,484 lbs. of tobacco. It was sold
on an average of eight and one half st. a lb. Deducting 270 lbs. for stems, the net weight brought a sum of f. 1790:19. But
the duty, freight charges, and convoy charges amounted to f. 629:15. The patroon said he would deduct only half of this if
Andriessen compensated him according to his ordinance for his land on which the tobacco grew. But as long as he was in dispute
with him he would deduct the whole sum. Andriessen did not suffer. Van Rensselaer complained in letter of March 16, 1643,
to Arent van Curler that he did not know what privilege Albert Andriessen had received, since "his cows are not mentioned
in the inventory sent him." He stated he would not want any one, no matter who he was, to own any animals which were
not subject to the right of pre-emption. Therefore, Curler should include Andriessen's animals in the inventory, or make him
leave the colony and pay for pasturing and hay during the past year
In September 5, 1643, the patroon stipulated the following with respect to Andriessen, whose term had long before expired
without his having obtained a new lease or contract.
He "shall . . . be continued for the present but shall not own live stock otherwise than according to the general
rule of one half of the increase belonging to the patroon and of the right of preemption and, in case he does not accept this,
his cattle shall immediately be sent back to the place whence they came, with the understanding, however, that half of the
increase bred in the colony shall go to the patroon in consideration of the pasturage and hay which they have used; and as
to his accounts he shall also be obliged to close, liquidate and settle the same; and as far as the conditions after the expiration
of his lease are concerned, the patroon adopts for him as well as for all others this fixed rule, of which they must all be
notified and if they do not wish to continue under it must immediately leave the colony, namely, that every freeman who has
a house and garden of his own shall pay an annual rent of 5 stivers per Rhineland rod and for land used in raising tobacco,
wheat or other fruits 20 guilders per Rhineland morgen, newly cleared land to be free for a number of years, more or less,
according to the amount of labor required in such clearing.
Andriessen not only cultivated tobacco. He operated "two large sawmills," run by a "powerful waterfall,"
worth as much as f. 1000 annual rent, but the patroon let him have them for f. 250 annual rent. 17 From May 4, 1652, to May
4, 1672, Andriessen is charged with the annual rent for these two mills and the land on Norman's Kill. 18 Originally this
Kill was called Tawasentha, meaning a place of the many dead. The Dutch appelative of Norman's Kill is derived from Andriessen.
In New Amsterdam he had acquired a house and lot from Hendrick Kip, August 29, 1651. It lay northeast of fort Amsterdam."
Under date of October 5, 1655, we find that he was taxed fi. 20 for this house and lot.
In May, 1655, before the court of the Burgomasters and Schepens in New Amsterdam, Roeloff Jansen, a butcher, appeared
and made a complaint against Christiaen Barentsen, attorney for Andriessen. Jansen had leased a house and some land belonging
to Andriessen who was to give him some cows. But the house was not tight" and "not enclosed," and the cows
were missing. might still suffer. The defendant, as attorney for Andriessen, replied that it was not his fault that the demand
had not been complied with according to the contract. He requested time to. write to his principal about it. The Court granted
him a month's time in which to do this. In due time, however, the court ruled that Andriessen should make the necessary repairs.
Some years later, Simon Clasen Turck started a suit against Andriessen, of which we shall let the court minutes of New
* [August 19, 16591. "Simon Turck, pltf., vs. Dirck van Schelluyne as att'y of Albert Andriessen, deft. Deft,
in default. Symon Turck produces in Court in writing his demand against Albert Andriessen concluding, that the attachment
on the two cows grazing with Wolfert Webber shall stand good and have its full effect, until the said Albert Andriessen shall
have paid him his arrears to the amount of fi. 2, sent to him by Joris Jans Rapalje Ao. 1649, the 3d Septr. in the absence
of Pieter Cornelissen, millwright, decd., not accounted for nor made good by him." The attachment on the cows is declared
valid by the Court.22
* [August 19]. "Dirck van Schelluyne in quality as att'y for Albert Andriessen Noorman, answers demand of Symon
Clasen Turck. The court orders copy to be furnished to party to answer thereunto at the next Court day."23
* [September 2]. "Symon Clasen Turck replies to answer of Dirck van Schelluyne, att'y of Albert Andriessen. Court
orders copy to be furnished to party to rejoin at the next court day,"24
* [September 23]. "Tielman van Vleeck as att'y for Turck requests by petition, that Sybout Clazen shall be ordered
to deliver by the next Court day his papers used against the abovenamed Symon Turck; also that Dirck van Schelluyne, att'y
of Albert Andriessen, shall be ordered to rejoin to Symon Turck's reply.
Apostille: Petitioner's request is granted, and parties shall be ordered to prosecute their suit by the next court day.
"On date 17th January 1660, has Dirck van Schelluyne furnished me Secretary Joannes Nevius, his rejoinder, and demand
in reconvention, as attorney of Albert Andriessen against Tielman van Vleec, att'y of Symon Clazen Turck, also rejoinder of
Abra ham Verplanck against ditto Van Vleeck as substitute of Anthony Clasen More: Whereupon the President of the Burgomasters
and Schepens ordered: Copy hereof to be furnished to party, and parties are ordered to exchange their papers with each other
and to produce their deductions and principal intendit by inventory on the next Court day."
On January 22, 1660, the Burgomasters and Schepens dismissed the "pltfs. suit instituted herein" and condemned
him to pay the costs incurred in this suit.
But a few days later, on January 28, 1660, it rendered the following decision: "Burgomasters and Schepens of the
City of Amsterdam in N: Netherland having considered, read and reread the vouchers, documents and papers used on both sides
in the suit between Tielman van Vleeck attorney of Simon Clasen Turck, (as husband and guardian of Merretje Pieters, daughter
of the dec[eas]d Pieter Cornelissen, millwright, and his lawful heir, as well for himself as representing herein the orphan
child of Tryntie Pieters, deceased daughter of said Pieter Cornelissen) pltf. against Dirck Van Schelluyne, attorney of Albert
Andriessen Noorman, residing at Fort Orange, deft. relative to and concerning two hundred guilders, which Symon Clasen Turck
is demanding from Albert Andriesen for so much, that Albert Andriesen has received from Jorsey in the absence of Pieter Comelissen,
millwright, dated 3rd September, 1649, gone to Virginia and not computed by him nor made good as appears by contract made
between Albert Andriessen and Symon Clasen Turck by the intermediation of - Corlear and Dirck van Schelluyne according to
acte thereof executed before D: V. Hamel, Secretary of the Colony of Reinselaars Wyck, dated 27th September, 1658; and whereas
the words of the contract read as follows :-
'Firstly, Symon Turck shall collect, receive, retain and dispose of as his own according to his pleasure, all outstanding
debts receivable, wherever they be; all effects and goods found in the house of the deceased Pieter Cornelissen, whether belonging
to him individually or to his Company or Association; On the other hand, Albert Andriesen assumes himself all the debts payable
where and to whomsoever they may be, relating to their partnership, whether these stand in the name of Pieter Cornelissen
or his own name. promises to release Symon Turck from all claims relating hereunto.' - having looked into, examined and weighed
everything material, Burgomasters and Schepens find it right, that the pltf's demand be dismissed, inasmuch as they find,
that the two hundred guilders were not to be received, but were paid several years since to Joris Rapalj e, who sent the same
to Albert Andriesen Noorman and are accordingly not payable to the estate of Pieter Cornelissen, but whenever Symon Turck
or his attorney can prove that, at the time of the settlement of accounts and writing of the contract, Albert Andriesen Noorman
notified Symon Turck, that he should receive the 11. 200., hereinbefore in question, from Sybout Clasen, then Albert Andriesen
shall give and pay the above mentioned fi. 200., with costs, and in default of proof the pltf. is condemned in the costs of
the suit. Regarding the demand in reconvention about certain planks, no disposition can be made therein as the same is moved
according to the Lites Contest atio. Thus done and adjudged by the Burgomaster and Schepens of the City of Amsterdam in New
Netherland as above.
"Adj. as above
The court minutes under date of June 8, 1660, regarding this litigation, state:
"On petition of Tielman Van Vleeck, attorney for Symon Clasen Turck, wherein he requests that the Court may not
only examine, but also expedite the solution given by him relative to the fulfillment of the interlocutory judgment pronounced
28th January last, it is ordered :-Copy of the solution shall be furnished to party to answer thereunto at the next Court
And under date of January 29, 1661, the minutes pertaining to this case read: "On the petition of Tielman van
Vleeck, agent of Symon Clasen Turck, wherein he requests, as Albert Andriesen Noorman remains in default, to answer the solution
given in to Court on the 8th of June 1660, that the above named Albert Andries(e)n shall in contumacy be condemned to pay
him petitioner the computed two hundred guilders remaining due to him; Whereupon was ordered: The petitioner shall notify
his party hereof according to law before June 5, 1662.
"Appeared before me Robert Livingston, secretary etc., and in presence of the honorable Messieurs Philip Schuyler
and Dirck Wessells, commisaries etc., Albert Andriese Bratt, who acknowledged that he is well and truly indebted and in arrears
to Mr. Nicolaus Van Renselaer, director of colony of Renselaerswyck, in the sum of 3,956 guilders, as appears by the books
of the colony of Renselaerswyck, growing out of the part rent for the mill and land; which aforesaid 3,956 guilders the mortgagor,
to the aforenamed Mr. Director or to his successors, promise to pay, provided that whatever he, the mortgagor shall make appear
to have been paid thereon shall be deducted: pledging therefor, specially, the produce of his orchard, standing behind the
house which the mortgagor now possesses, from which produce of the orchard he promises to pay in rent during life twenty guilders
in patroon's money in apples, and generally pledging his person and estate, personal and real, present and future, nothing
excepted; submitting the same to the force of all laws and judges to promote the payment thereof in due time, if need be,
without loss or cost.
"Done in Albany, without craft or guile, on the 30th of October, 1677.
"Aalbert Andriess Brat.
"Acknowledged before me,
"Robt. Livingstone, Secr.
Albert Andriessen died June 7, 1686
Albert's First Wife, Annetie Barents (Van) Rottmer and her mother, Geesie Barentsdr.
Gissel or Geesie Barentsdr. [Barentsdochter] assisted her daughter Annatie Barents Van Rottmer at the signing of banns
on 27 March 1632 for her marriage to Albert Andriessen. Annetie was 24 years old. When Annatie's brother Barent Barents signed
his banns at the age of 22, on 21 Apr. 1632 he too was assisted by his mother. At the time Gissel was living on the Schaepensteegje
or Sheep Alley in Amsterdam, Netherlands. Geesie's husband Barent Rottmer is never listed, so it is assumed he died before
When Geesie Barents came to New Netherland on board "Den Waterhondt" in the fall of 1640 her husband Barent
Rottmer was dead. By the end of 1640 she had married Pieter Jacobse Van Rynsburgh, whether in Holland or not is not known.
Pieter was probably the West India Company gunner at Fort Orange.
The passenger list of Den Waterhondt, which sailed from The Texel in June or July 1640 for New Netherland, lists Gijsje
Berents, wife of Pieter Jacobsz. Gijsje was charged with board on den Waterhondt in 1640 and credited with 28 days work done
by her husband at the home of Arent van Curler. Pieter Jacobsz may have been the "constapel" of Fort Orange, who
on 15 April 1652 by order of Johannes Dyckman, tore van Slichtenhorst's proclamation from the house of Gijsbert Cornelisz,
Geesie and Pieter filed a joint will in New Amsterdam in June 1642 leaving all of their separate estates to each other.
If Geesie died first, Pieter was to pay her daughter Annatie, twenty carolus guilders. Since Pieter made the first of three
payments to the deacons of Fort Orange for an adult funeral pall, on 12 April 1658, it appears that Geesie had died that previous
winter or spring.
Geesie's daughter, Annetie Bradt, appears to have died early in 1661 since a payment for a pall was made on 13 February
* sp1-Annatie Barents VAN ROTTMER (1608-1661)
* sp2-Pietertje JANS ( -1667)
* sp3-Geertruy Pieterse COEYMANS ( -1695)
(Children are all by first wife)
* 3-- Aefje (Eva) BRADT-
sp-Antony DE HOOGES-2931 ( -1655)
sp-Roeloff SWARTWOUT-2932 (1634-1715)
* 3-- Barent BRADT-469 (1634)
sp-Susanna Dirckx MEYER-470 (1640-1722)
* 3-- Storm Albertse VANDERZEE-2277 (1636-1679)
* 3-- Engeltie BRADT-2278 (1637-1683)
* 3-- Gisseltie BRADT-2279 (1640-1677)
> sp-Jan VAN EECHELEN-2934
* 3-- Andries BRADT-2280 (1642-1706)
sp-Cornelia VAN WIE-2937
* 3-- Jan Albertsen BRADT (1648-1695)
sp-Maria Moockers POST (1649)[Lorine's line]
* 3-- Dirk BRADT-2281 (1650)
Albert's Brother, Arent Andriesse
Arent Andriesse BRADT-253 ( -1662)
sp-Catalyntje DE VOS-254 ( -1712)
* 3-- Aeffie BRADT-255 (1649-1728)
sp-Claes Fredickse VAN PETTEN-6029 (1641-1728)
* 3-- Ariaantje BRADT-256 ( -1717)
sp-Helmers OTTEN-4373 ( -1676)
sp-Reyer Jacobse SCHERMERHORN-4374
* 3-- Andries Arentse BRADT-257 (1653-1690)
sp-Margareta (Grietje) VAN SLYCK-261 (1665-1733)
* 3-- Cornelia BRADT-258 (1655-1690)
sp-Jan POOTMAN-3380 ( -1690)
* 3-- Samuel Arentss BRADT-192 (1659-1713)
sp-Susannah VAN SLYCK-191 (1662-1713)
* 3-- Dirk Arentse BRADT-259 (1661-1735)
sp-Maritje VAN EPS-260 (1661)
If you are searching for your Bradt ancestors, you might want to look at New York Marriages Previous to 1784 for the surname
Bradt, as extracted by Family Generations
* 1. Scandanavian Immigrants to New York 1630-1674 by John O. Evjen. 1916
* 2. Bradt: A Norwegian Family in Colonial America by Peter R. Christoph
* 3. Bradt Records From Amsterdam contributed by Robert G. Cooney Jr in The New York Genealogical & Biographical
Record Vol. 118 Number 3 July 1987
* 4. Origins of Some New Netherland Families by Harry Macy Jr. in The New York Genealogical & Biographical Record
Vol. 123 Number 1 January 1992
* 5. Origins of Some New Netherland Families: Ennes - Barents - Goderis - Hibon - Lewis - Bradt by Elva Kathleen Lyon
in The New York Genealogical & Biographical Record Vol. 127 #4 Oct. 1996 pp 202-204